Warrior General Games

This is probably another crap idea/complaint by me and maybe its been addressed but I keep having this situation happen to me. After readibng some of these suggestions theres a common theme being made and that is for people to enjoy and have fun playing this game.

Stacking teams takes the fun out of this game for me. I personally like running Pee Wee teams and creating new players. Building my team through recruiting etc... What I hate though is when you have a team in your league that has one single Owner/Agent that controlls the entire team and they build an entire 3 deep roster by themself. Theres no way to comepete with a team like that at this level.They become a juggernaut and run through everyone no matter how well you put a team together or how you gameplan.

It would be nice if you could have a cap of the amount of player that you have on one team. Even if it were set at a whole starting lineup. So if it were capped at 24 then the person would at least have to recruit some other people and get everyone on the same page. Making it take teamwork to win a championship.

I see why the rule isnt in place as Im sure GLB is happy to have people spend that many flex points. So can someone tell me if this has been addressed before? Am I way off base here? I just know it sucks to get stuck playing a team like that. And people wont sign with you if they see a team like that in your league. It become a wasted season.

Why are you assuming that the team with a one-agent roster is somehow better than your team of many? It may take a little more effort and leadership on your part to coordinate the team to all be on the same page where he doesn't have to, but his team is not inherently better than yours.

With this, it's likely that people will result to not having full teams or make multis to get around this. There is nothing wrong with one agent teams since it brings money to GLB and is quite hard to run since you are controlling a lot of players.

Originally posted by CocoJedi
With this, it's likely that people will result to not having full teams or make multis to get around this. There is nothing wrong with one agent teams since it brings money to GLB and is quite hard to run since you are controlling a lot of players.


Which is why i never see it changing.


Originally posted by We_Rule
Why are you assuming that the team with a one-agent roster is somehow better than your team of many? It may take a little more effort and leadership on your part to coordinate the team to all be on the same page where he doesn't have to, but his team is not inherently better than yours.


Because those are the teams that win almost every pee wee championship. Just going by what Ive seen. They tend to be better because they have a full roster of human players where most Pee Wee teams typically dont. The team with one owner is usually a veteran player and has good builds on average. Its hard to recruit a full pee wee team period let alone one with good builds.


Originally posted by Dr. Showtime
Originally posted by NGTH

-Limit number of players owned by a player on a team (if someone wants to fill their team with their own players, as long as the person is under the roster limit, that's their choice, it doesn't hurt the game at all)


It hurts the game for me. Take some of the fun out of it. I know that Im not alone here as Ive had many people tell me it feels like a wasted year once they realize a team like that is in their league.


This was obviously all from my view point. So it does affect the game for me. It may be a completely individual problem thats just plain stupid which is fine. I thought this was the place for suggestions, so I made one that pertained to me. I appreciate those who provided feedback without being condescending

copper isn't very competitive and people are starting to lose interest in peewee. If you want to see agents collaborate, check gold, and then again, most glber would rather have their player be in minor leagues since they can boost to higher levels.

You pay to win the game.

You pay to win the game.

[/herm edwards]

and teams that are 50% filled with players aren't great for the game either

Originally posted by jamz
You pay to win the game.

You pay to win the game.

[/herm edwards]

Thats awesome. Thanks for the laughs.

Originally posted by CocoJedi
and teams that are 50% filled with players aren't great for the game either


I would say its not necessarly a very bad thing at all. Its money in their pockets. Otherwise there would be less leagues and divisions.

Thanks for the insight on the leagues. Ill keep that in mind next season.

You don't need to worry about it this season.
All the teams you're playing aren't even full yet.....

Originally posted by T LIGHT
This is probably another crap idea/complaint by me and maybe its been addressed but I keep having this situation happen to me. After readibng some of these suggestions theres a common theme being made and that is for people to enjoy and have fun playing this game.

Stacking teams takes the fun out of this game for me. I personally like running Pee Wee teams and creating new players. Building my team through recruiting etc... What I hate though is when you have a team in your league that has one single Owner/Agent that controlls the entire team and they build an entire 3 deep roster by themself. Theres no way to comepete with a team like that at this level.They become a juggernaut and run through everyone no matter how well you put a team together or how you gameplan.

It would be nice if you could have a cap of the amount of player that you have on one team. Even if it were set at a whole starting lineup. So if it were capped at 24 then the person would at least have to recruit some other people and get everyone on the same page. Making it take teamwork to win a championship.

I see why the rule isnt in place as Im sure GLB is happy to have people spend that many flex points. So can someone tell me if this has been addressed before? Am I way off base here? I just know it sucks to get stuck playing a team like that. And people wont sign with you if they see a team like that in your league. It become a wasted season.

No way to compete huh. I've not had one of those teams beat me yet.