Originally posted by aaasahi
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5528&pbp_id=145398
And even this play runner make 9.5 yds gain, it's still a huge problem in FB path.
What make FB turn back to block RDE when there already are LG and LT?
Further more, FB then run to the middle, totally opposite where ball carrier go to.

We noticed that during the pulling lineman test that the OG would always stop his path to help block the DE. Maybe their threat level is pretty high.

Originally posted by lardaddy
not sure this will get seen by any/all of the testers, but just wanna jump in here and say thanks for your hard work


+1
clearly a big effort going in this season.
Much appreciated.

Does the reduced tackle chance for blocked defenders apply on STs as well?

Originally posted by bhall43
Random fumble or INT happen? Cool. Thats fun.

Good point. Let's just get rid of turnovers completely so that offensive coordinators' precious gameplans are safe. This is Goal Line Chess Beta, right? As a bonus, defenders could stop wasting any investment in force fumble or intercept abilities.

Think you missed my point while you were sulking.

Originally posted by aaasahi
For outside running test....
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5528&pbp_id=145386
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5528&pbp_id=145384
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5581&pbp_id=156491
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5581&pbp_id=156487
I saw WR just try "Hard Block" and fall down, CB go to tackle ball carrier.
Will these shit "Hard Block" be fixed?
It's like every time WR do this they never success.
I would rather they don't do that.

I'm glad you brought this up. I've had the same experience with my blocking WR as you've had with yours. Lots of these hard blocks failing when my guy is perfectly capable of holding a block if he actually tried to engage. It doesn't seem like an action that js appropriate for the typical WR-CB interaction.

Originally posted by bhall43
Think you missed my point while you were sulking.

My point is that you don't have a point. If you take away random fumbles and INTs then there aren't any turnovers left.

Originally posted by TrevJo
My point is that you don't have a point. If you take away random fumbles and INTs then there aren't any turnovers left.


My point wasn't taking them away. My point was the nature of which an int happened in s26 made no sense. It wasn't aan int based off builds nor did the pass go in directions of my receiving targets. Those things are irritating. I don't care how many ints defense gets as long as they make some sort of sense most of the time.

Originally posted by bhall43
I don't care how many ints defense gets as long as they make some sort of sense most of the time.

QBs fumbling more when sacked makes all the sense in the world. So I'm glad you are ok with turnovers that make sense.

Originally posted by bhall43
My point wasn't taking them away. My point was the nature of which an int happened in s26 made no sense. It wasn't aan int based off builds nor did the pass go in directions of my receiving targets. Those things are irritating. I don't care how many ints defense gets as long as they make some sort of sense most of the time.

I imagine a QB dropping back to pass, having his arm hit by a defender causing the ball to go way way off trajectory is something that would never happen in GLB, right? Infallible builds and all.

Originally posted by TrevJo
QBs fumbling more when sacked makes all the sense in the world. So I'm glad you are ok with turnovers that make sense.

I agree.

Originally posted by Toriq
I imagine a QB dropping back to pass, having his arm hit by a defender causing the ball to go way way off trajectory is something that would never happen in GLB, right? Infallible builds and all.

If it were even the case of him super hurried id understand a little bit. That was my hatred for s26. Nothing made sense. Rng controlled everything.

Originally posted by bug03
http://test.goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=5441&pbp_id=127051

Shoulda had a deep zone in there.