JESUS THEY SCORE THE FIGHT AS IT HAPPENS THEY DONT DECIDE AFTER 12 ROUNDS THAT BECAUSE HE DID WELL AT THE END HE ALSO WON EARLY ROUNDS FUCK OFF YOU FAGGOT

Exactly. You score each round after it happens. So what should have happened was even if you scored Bradley winning the last three rounds, Manny should have been up by three or more already. And since Manny was never knocked down, there was no way that he should have lost.

Originally posted by GUCCi4
Originally posted by Circles

thats not what you said

Originally posted by GUCCi4

Pacquiao lost the last 3 rounds which ended up killing him with the judges



dumbest of all dumb statements.
its scored round by round, you win more rounds you win the fight, Manny won more rounds. just cause he lost the last couple doesnt mean he lost the fight
Originally posted by Circles
JESUS THEY SCORE THE FIGHT AS IT HAPPENS THEY DONT DECIDE AFTER 12 ROUNDS THAT BECAUSE HE DID WELL AT THE END HE ALSO WON EARLY ROUNDS FUCK OFF YOU FAGGOT

Originally posted by Greenday4537
Exactly. You score each round after it happens. So what should have happened was even if you scored Bradley winning the last three rounds, Manny should have been up by three or more already. And since Manny was never knocked down, there was no way that he should have lost.

man, it's pretty cool not having interesting heavyweights in the sport.

MANY PACKYAO

Failing to see what I'm saying.

I'm not saying it was right, I had the fight at 115-113 at worst case scenario for Pacquiao. I'm saying what hurt him in the judges eyes was losing the last 3. Judges get swayed by stuff like that, and that was evident in this fight. I don't see the disagreement here.

Originally posted by archstanton
man, it's pretty cool not having interesting heavyweights in the sport.

uh have you seen david haye and derek chisora?

Originally posted by GUCCi4

Failing to see what I'm saying.

I'm not saying it was right, I had the fight at 115-113 at worst case scenario for Pacquiao. I'm saying what hurt him in the judges eyes was losing the last 3. Judges get swayed by stuff like that, and that was evident in this fight. I don't see the disagreement here.



Are you implying that the judges went back and re-scored the earlier rounds because of how the last 3 rounds went? because thats the only way what you are saying makes ANY sense.

Originally posted by Osmlol
Are you implying that the judges went back and re-scored the earlier rounds because of how the last 3 rounds went? because thats the only way what you are saying makes ANY sense.



that's exactly what happened so yes

Originally posted by Timetoshine-Metta
that's exactly what happened so yes

From what i understand thats not how your score boxing. So his argument is invalid, which is what i was trying to convey.

Originally posted by Osmlol
From what i understand thats not how your score boxing. So his argument is invalid, which is what i was trying to convey.

Well, clearly these judges were doing something wrong.