Warrior General Games

Originally posted by razor9
2 point conversions. When seriously? Basically you can be in a close game and miss an XP at some point (which happens more than it should) and if you get down by a TD, it's a two possession game in the end. When can we see this off the back burner?

Don't know. Bort doesn't want it to be possible to do a 2 point conversion whenever possible so we need to come up with a list of defined criteria of when it can be called.

Why is there rollover? Why can't we train, assign skill points, etc. without having the player locked up for several hours a night?

What was the final word on accelerating player development? There was a lot of support for it, and it really seems like something that would be in the best interest of GLB.

Any chance you could put together a Handheld Stylesheet for Phone users without a planned application like the Iphone?

Originally posted by Catch22
Originally posted by razor9

2 point conversions. When seriously? Basically you can be in a close game and miss an XP at some point (which happens more than it should) and if you get down by a TD, it's a two possession game in the end. When can we see this off the back burner?

Don't know. Bort doesn't want it to be possible to do a 2 point conversion whenever possible so we need to come up with a list of defined criteria of when it can be called.

Well what I've seen discussed was in the last two minutes of a game. If it was narrowed down like that, would it have a better chance of implementation?

Catch - any idea if pooch punts or fake punts are on the docket for, well, ever?

Any chance you think the building process might be accelerated in the not so distant future?

Originally posted by TyrannyVaunt
Why is there rollover? Why can't we train, assign skill points, etc. without having the player locked up for several hours a night?

Because there are numerous scripts that need to be ran and in order to do that various parts of the site have to be "locked"

What's the feeling around the admin crew on games that Sim in the WL that end in scores with deficits of 90-100 points?

Is the margin for error between top teams, and the next tier teams where you want it? Working as intended or something to be worked on?

Originally posted by j10er
What was the final word on accelerating player development? There was a lot of support for it, and it really seems like something that would be in the best interest of GLB.

Still undecided - the priority for GLB was the extended plateau. We want to see how this works before revisiting accelerated player development.

Originally posted by calamnet
Any chance you could put together a Handheld Stylesheet for Phone users without a planned application like the Iphone?


No clue lol - if Bort were here I'd ask him, sorry.

Originally posted by jamz
What's the feeling around the admin crew on games that Sim in the WL that end in scores with deficits of 90-100 points?

Is the margin for error between top teams, and the next tier teams where you want it? Working as intended or something to be worked on?

This is a great question. The difference between the elite and average is such a slippery slope. I look forward to this response.

Originally posted by razor9
Well what I've seen discussed was in the last two minutes of a game. If it was narrowed down like that, would it have a better chance of implementation?

Probably. I think if we limited it to the last five minutes of the game it might be more feasible.

Would a Special Teams AI be possible or wanted to be implemented?
Originally posted by Staz
Personally, I feel that STs needs an advanced AI, with fair catch settings, punt/kick return right, left and middle as well as returns right, left, middle. On top of that, there are a couple different basic formations/plays that I'd like to be able to use on for both sides of punts and kicks.

Originally posted by boomer82
Catch - any idea if pooch punts or fake punts are on the docket for, well, ever?

I'm not Bort but I doubt it, seems too exploitable.