Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Idk, I would still give the edge to Valhalla, just because they were head and shoulders above pretty much everyone. There were only a couple teams that could contend with Valhalla.
No doubt HHWC's three were more impressive in terms of stringing the wins together (I think even ufshowboat will admit he didn't expect to do it), though.
Question is, was Valhalla really that good, or was there just not nearly as many good teams as now. I think the competition is getting better now. I think Valhalla would find it much harder these days than in their time...HOWEVER, I take nothing from w_alloys ability to win, so think maybe he would have found the next big thing already and would still be winning more than the others...
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., said. "Rolling back responsible citizens' rights is not the proper response to tragedies committed by criminals and the mentally ill."