Originally posted by wormser1971
So, you have made up your mind on who you will trust. Tell me who that is? NIST? FEMA? Obama? Popular mechanics was proven to be fraudulent in their arguments. Should I quote them? How about a special on PBS? would you trust PBS?
I get the feeling that you only trust sources that you have already selected in your mind. Maybe if an MIT professor told you he was a debunker and he had a paper about the collapse that proved it all (Bazant), you would believe that. Until you found out that 2 years later he stepped away from that paper and was shamed among physicists for the horrible false assumptions he made in his paper. He became a shill for the official stroy, and will have to live with that lie forever.
So who will you believe?
Which is why one must do due diligence in their OWN research and come to their OWN conclusions based on all the available evidence and information. Not rely solely on so called "experts" to formulate your opinions on what happened that day.
So, you have made up your mind on who you will trust. Tell me who that is? NIST? FEMA? Obama? Popular mechanics was proven to be fraudulent in their arguments. Should I quote them? How about a special on PBS? would you trust PBS?
I get the feeling that you only trust sources that you have already selected in your mind. Maybe if an MIT professor told you he was a debunker and he had a paper about the collapse that proved it all (Bazant), you would believe that. Until you found out that 2 years later he stepped away from that paper and was shamed among physicists for the horrible false assumptions he made in his paper. He became a shill for the official stroy, and will have to live with that lie forever.
So who will you believe?
Which is why one must do due diligence in their OWN research and come to their OWN conclusions based on all the available evidence and information. Not rely solely on so called "experts" to formulate your opinions on what happened that day.