Warrior General Games

Originally posted by GP1
Day 31ers are no more exploiters than Day 40s who are simply seeking to get extra boosts. DUC how dumb your argument it?

He's blinded by his own lame agenda that he sees only bullshit

Originally posted by Mightyhalo
Threads like this expose those who are only looking out for their own self interests, and those that are looking out for what is best for the good of the game.
Well, doesn't dpride have a ton of dots that were d31?

GLB is missing the boat on this...DD comes into the thread and says it is something they are considering but probably not next season. The time to do it is to combine it with plateau. With the changes to no training after day 440 agents need to know if they will be able to wear lvl72 eq...so they can save the BTs for aeq upgrades.



The main thing is this makes the game better and gets rid of this artificial division between haves/have nots and lvl 72 eq.

Originally posted by GP1
Day 31ers are no more exploiters than Day 40s who are simply seeking to get extra boosts. DUC how dumb your argument it?

Day 31ers did it to have an advantage, and they got one. Now that it no longer works for them, now it should be changed? This game is all about choices. You made yours now live with it.

Something about having your cake and eating it too comes to mind.

How does this make the game better? I see how it makes the game better for some, but what about the others that made a conscious sacrifice. How is it better for them?

If you plan to use the ignorance defense, then I will preempt that with my season one players were made on bad days and I learned my lesson by the time season 3 came around. Why will no one else take that same responsibility?

Originally posted by ChicagoTRS
The main thing is this makes the game better and gets rid of this artificial division between haves/have nots and lvl 72 eq.

It is the only distinction between the haves and have nots.

If you boost early and often you are at a disadvantage to equally built equal level dots that do not, until you hit level 72.

Please oh please someone disprove this, and I'll agree to your silly proposition.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
Originally posted by GP1

Day 31ers are no more exploiters than Day 40s who are simply seeking to get extra boosts. DUC how dumb your argument it?

Day 31ers did it to have an advantage, and they got one. Now that it no longer works for them, now it should be changed? This game is all about choices. You made yours now live with it.

Something about having your cake and eating it too comes to mind.

How does this make the game better? I see how it makes the game better for some, but what about the others that made a conscious sacrifice. How is it better for them?

If you plan to use the ignorance defense, then I will preempt that with my season one players were made on bad days and I learned my lesson by the time season 3 came around. Why will no one else take that same responsibility?



No one else will take the responsibility because you're either an idiot or a liar. I'm not sure which one is worse. How did you learn your lesson in season 3? That's not even possible. The annoucmenet wasnt made until season 9 or 10.

Moreover, you entirely missed the point of my analogy. You're sitting here saying that people who created dots on day 31 did it for an exploit and shouldnt be rewarded. Well, taking your ridiculous argument at face level, that you knew in season 3 about the 440 cut off date, you were doing the same exact thing: creating dots for the simple reason of having 3 extra boosts.

Why is your behavior acceptable but the day 31 actions aren't? You make no sense. This is a beta game and we're supposed to be here to better it. Not for selfish motives.

This should never be done. There are many players who built early to maximize their efforts in the low level minors. To give them the option to boost to 72 now is ludicrous. The math was always the same.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
Originally posted by ChicagoTRS

The main thing is this makes the game better and gets rid of this artificial division between haves/have nots and lvl 72 eq.

It is the only distinction between the haves and have nots.

If you boost early and often you are at a disadvantage to equally built equal level dots that do not, until you hit level 72.

Please oh please someone disprove this, and I'll agree to your silly proposition.

omg. im utterly speechless.

Originally posted by VenomCoach
This should never be done. There are many players who built early to maximize their efforts in the low level minors. To give them the option to boost to 72 now is ludicrous. The math was always the same.

No, it wasn't the same - Noone knew back then what "the math" would be since noone knew what the age cut-off for boosting would be. Shit, we didn't even know for sure there would be an age cut-off for boosting.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
It is the only distinction between the haves and have nots.

If you boost early and often you are at a disadvantage to equally built equal level dots that do not, until you hit level 72.

Please oh please someone disprove this, and I'll agree to your silly proposition.

Tempted to report this for trolling. Asserting something and then saying it's true until someone disproves it is a complete fallacy, btw.

Originally posted by GP1
No one else will take the responsibility because you're either an idiot or a liar. I'm not sure which one is worse. How did you learn your lesson in season 3? That's not even possible. The annoucmenet wasnt made until season 9 or 10.

Based on what I figured out I found that the best possible chance to boost as many times as possible would be to create a player then.

Originally posted by GP1

Moreover, you entirely missed the point of my analogy. You're sitting here saying that people who created dots on day 31 did it for an exploit and shouldnt be rewarded. Well, taking your ridiculous argument at face level, that you knew in season 3 about the 440 cut off date, you were doing the same exact thing: creating dots for the simple reason of having 3 extra boosts.

Why is your behavior acceptable but the day 31 actions aren't?

Give...and...Take. You decided to take, and now it is time to give. I decided to give, and now it is time for me to take.

You want it to be take and take for you, while I get the Give and give part. I know you will not understand this nor accept it, so I'll be leaving now.

Originally posted by kurieg
Tempted to report this for trolling. Asserting something and then saying it's true until someone disproves it is a complete fallacy, btw.

REPORTED for trolling.

I in no way said it was true until someone disproves it I said disprove it and I will join the ranks calling for boost from level 47 to 75.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
Based on what I figured out I found that the best possible chance to boost as many times as possible would be to create a player then.


How? Your assertion; back it up or it's worthless.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Well, doesn't dpride have a ton of dots that were d31?


Yeah it looks like he has some, but his dots are all over the map. Of course I didn't look at all of them, just a sample since it looks like a 100 dots on his home page.

Originally posted by DONKEIDIC
REPORTED for trolling.

I in no way said it was true until someone disproves it I said disprove it and I will join the ranks calling for boost from level 47 to 75.


KK, so there's nothing to the assertion, and therefore no reason not to work out some kinda deal for those dots that came up a little short on the timeline.