Originally posted by jdbolick
Way more than half.
WM1. If you're going to unlock something for multi-training then you should absolutely be taking that to 30% enhancement.
WM2. Plenty of defensive dots can be better by taking 4 AEQ. A basic rule to use is that if your build can benefit from 3 different types of % then you should really think about 4 AEQ. If your build can benefit from 2 different types of % and also has an end or near-end of tree SA you want to push, then you should really think about 4 AEQ.
WM3. 86 is extreme. I go that far for the first attribute on QB, OL, & DL because they only have a small number of attributes I really care about anyway, but stopping at 83 is fine and I've been stopping at 77 on the first attribute for positions like HB where I want to invest in a lot of different attributes.
WM4. lolno. Multi-training as soon as possible defeats the whole point of pushing that first attribute so highly. You shouldn't start multi-training until you've third capped that first attribute.
WM5. Triple stacking is viable, but hardly necessary. In fact, I don't think I've ever done it since they got diminishing returns. Taking favored SAs to 12-13 is also a good use of AEQ, especially if they're toward the end of the tree.
WM6. Not a bad idea, but it's not going to ruin a build if you start putting some in SAs in the 40s or 50s. I think level 38 is when ALGs drop to their lowest point, and so once you've moved on from primaries to secondaries then you don't lose much by postponing those. I generally wait, but if investing in SAs a little early makes the dot more fun then I'm fine with that.
I agree.
My build process is similar, but as you have stated, the build plans must differ based on the intended use of the dot, how valuable each attribute is towards that goal, and the majors and minors available.
Way more than half.
WM1. If you're going to unlock something for multi-training then you should absolutely be taking that to 30% enhancement.
WM2. Plenty of defensive dots can be better by taking 4 AEQ. A basic rule to use is that if your build can benefit from 3 different types of % then you should really think about 4 AEQ. If your build can benefit from 2 different types of % and also has an end or near-end of tree SA you want to push, then you should really think about 4 AEQ.
WM3. 86 is extreme. I go that far for the first attribute on QB, OL, & DL because they only have a small number of attributes I really care about anyway, but stopping at 83 is fine and I've been stopping at 77 on the first attribute for positions like HB where I want to invest in a lot of different attributes.
WM4. lolno. Multi-training as soon as possible defeats the whole point of pushing that first attribute so highly. You shouldn't start multi-training until you've third capped that first attribute.
WM5. Triple stacking is viable, but hardly necessary. In fact, I don't think I've ever done it since they got diminishing returns. Taking favored SAs to 12-13 is also a good use of AEQ, especially if they're toward the end of the tree.
WM6. Not a bad idea, but it's not going to ruin a build if you start putting some in SAs in the 40s or 50s. I think level 38 is when ALGs drop to their lowest point, and so once you've moved on from primaries to secondaries then you don't lose much by postponing those. I generally wait, but if investing in SAs a little early makes the dot more fun then I'm fine with that.
I agree.
My build process is similar, but as you have stated, the build plans must differ based on the intended use of the dot, how valuable each attribute is towards that goal, and the majors and minors available.
