Warrior General Games

Originally posted by StoutOne


I read nothing but this quote, and yeah, DC's do not create the retarded HB coverage. You're a fucking moron if you don't think there's a bug with LB's and HB coverage.

How many LBs can cover a Scat back in any level of football?

Originally posted by 5STAR
Originally posted by Bloodfart

Originally posted by mikeandbrooke07


Originally posted by 5STAR




but the DCs are the ones who create the retarded HB coverage...


this statement alone shows your intelligence level. try it out for yourself then and see what the results are







Ok I will...which one should I try it out on?

10-3 pro team

Or one of the following Minor league teams...
12-1
14-0
11-2
13-1

Let me know o_O

try it out on all them, i dont give a shit! you'll get the same results

Come on guys, don't be stupid...all you have to do is put a CB on the HB and TE every play.

Gosh, don't you know football?

Originally posted by 5STAR
Originally posted by StoutOne



I read nothing but this quote, and yeah, DC's do not create the retarded HB coverage. You're a fucking moron if you don't think there's a bug with LB's and HB coverage.

How many LBs can cover a Scat back in any level of football?

When 110+ speed LB's can't cover a HB out of the backfield even when they're already on the same side the HB is coming from, then yeah, that's not right.

This is a sim, LB's with same speed as HB's happens.....fuck, if they can't tackle, then at least let them cover....amiwrong?

Originally posted by StoutOne
Originally posted by 5STAR

Originally posted by StoutOne




I read nothing but this quote, and yeah, DC's do not create the retarded HB coverage. You're a fucking moron if you don't think there's a bug with LB's and HB coverage.

How many LBs can cover a Scat back in any level of football?

When 110+ speed LB's can't cover a HB out of the backfield even when they're already on the same side the HB is coming from, then yeah, that's not right.

This is a sim, LB's with same speed as HB's happens.....fuck, if they can't tackle, then at least let them cover....amiwrong?

nope not wrong...but SS and CB are more effective since they do not take the false step forward.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Come on guys, don't be stupid...all you have to do is put a CB on the HB and TE every play.

Gosh, don't you know football?

yeah, seriously

Originally posted by 5STAR
Originally posted by StoutOne

Originally posted by 5STAR


Originally posted by StoutOne





I read nothing but this quote, and yeah, DC's do not create the retarded HB coverage. You're a fucking moron if you don't think there's a bug with LB's and HB coverage.

How many LBs can cover a Scat back in any level of football?

When 110+ speed LB's can't cover a HB out of the backfield even when they're already on the same side the HB is coming from, then yeah, that's not right.

This is a sim, LB's with same speed as HB's happens.....fuck, if they can't tackle, then at least let them cover....amiwrong?

nope not wrong...but SS and CB are more effective since they do not take the false step forward.

If I, as the defensive coordinator, tell an LB that his job is to cover the HB out of the backfield on an obvious passing down, I expect him to not even THINK about blitzing, but rather move laterally whichever direction it appears he is going, and adjust as necessary on counter movement, I would BENCH HIS ASS IN A SECOND if he started towards the LOS unless there was play action....

Originally posted by griffin8r
If I, as the defensive coordinator, tell an LB that his job is to cover the HB out of the backfield on an obvious passing down, I expect him to not even THINK about blitzing, but rather move laterally whichever direction it appears he is going, and adjust as necessary on counter movement, I would BENCH HIS ASS IN A SECOND if he started towards the LOS....

nb4"Pass focus"....that way the LB can be completely and utterly useless on any rushing play.

Also, I suggested a setting in the DPC where LB's would instantly go into coverage rather than standing around with their thumb in their ass (on the test server). Bort didn't seem interested.

Originally posted by 5STAR

nope not wrong...but SS and CB are more effective since they do not take the false step forward.

It's obvious that a CB will cover better, but since LB's and CB's are built about identical (like 90% of the time on successful Pro level), then it's an issue. If I put a CB and LB in the same spot on the field, with the same exact build, the LB will struggle to get there, where as the CB will be there the whole time.....there's a definite issue with this.

I'd like to see stunts or line slants first.

LBs and safties should have read "drops" before they make the actual read of the play.

Originally posted by Bill Jack
I'd like to see stunts or line slants first.

I'd love those.

But again, it is something else the Bort didn't really seem that interested in.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by griffin8r

If I, as the defensive coordinator, tell an LB that his job is to cover the HB out of the backfield on an obvious passing down, I expect him to not even THINK about blitzing, but rather move laterally whichever direction it appears he is going, and adjust as necessary on counter movement, I would BENCH HIS ASS IN A SECOND if he started towards the LOS....

nb4"Pass focus"....that way the LB can be completely and utterly useless on any rushing play.

This would be the fatal flaw to not-live playcalling on a football sim.

This would also be the fatal flaw Bort has to overcome if he ever wants to see this sim get to Season 20....

Originally posted by viking maniac 1
LBs and safties should have read "drops" before they make the actual read of the play.

Honestly, I think the main problem is that LB's take anywhere from 5 to 10 ticks to read a play, while HB's and TE's have already covered approximately 15 yards in that amount of time.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Originally posted by viking maniac 1

LBs and safties should have read "drops" before they make the actual read of the play.

Honestly, I think the main problem is that LB's take anywhere from 5 to 10 ticks to read a play, while HB's and TE's have already covered approximately 15 yards in that amount of time.

Does your Vision LB make a difference in reads or avoiding getting pancake by lineman with his low Strength?