Guys,,,, go to the opponents house, rape some horses and ride their woman. Game over
Forum > Champion League > lolzeta
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by SG✬21
Man you didn't get this part did you?
I like how you run your mouth and then when someone points out something you can't answer, you make a weird non-response to get out of acknowledging the point. Again, we were talking about team quality. You babbled something about beating Richey, VDA, and Cincinnati, so I pointed out that no one including yourself believes Miami is better than any of those teams.
Originally posted by
I love how you're probably the only one that has actually come out and said that they don't think Miami was a good team. I guess you're just assuming that everyone has your back on this one though they've never actually stated much.
You honestly didn't notice everyone congratulating tautology on making the WL final right after the second round? No one gave you guys a chance even though MPHD was a flawed team. You were the 8th seed in one of the worst conferences in WL history. That means you're not a good team.
Originally posted by
Once again your huge ego is putting all else below you which is why your babbling about me as a DC when you've probably never even paid much attention to what I've done
The main thing I know you from is posting nonsense in the DC forum that I or some other competent DC has to then correct in case some new person mistakenly assumes you know what you're talking about.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Also, to be clear, UFC as the 8th seed did only beat the crap out of zeta's best team, they beat the crap out of alpha's best teams including your own.
It's funny how you keep illustrating that you're completely clueless regarding everything about the World League. UFC beat OFOTD by four points, and only won at all because my own stupid QB fumbled the ball in UFC territory with three minutes left. Meanwhile the Asau game was tied at the start of the fourth quarter. The Hood game wasn't at all close, but still wasn't as bad as the beating MPHD took. Machu Picchu was the weakest team we faced during that run.
Man you didn't get this part did you?
I like how you run your mouth and then when someone points out something you can't answer, you make a weird non-response to get out of acknowledging the point. Again, we were talking about team quality. You babbled something about beating Richey, VDA, and Cincinnati, so I pointed out that no one including yourself believes Miami is better than any of those teams.
Originally posted by
I love how you're probably the only one that has actually come out and said that they don't think Miami was a good team. I guess you're just assuming that everyone has your back on this one though they've never actually stated much.
You honestly didn't notice everyone congratulating tautology on making the WL final right after the second round? No one gave you guys a chance even though MPHD was a flawed team. You were the 8th seed in one of the worst conferences in WL history. That means you're not a good team.
Originally posted by
Once again your huge ego is putting all else below you which is why your babbling about me as a DC when you've probably never even paid much attention to what I've done
The main thing I know you from is posting nonsense in the DC forum that I or some other competent DC has to then correct in case some new person mistakenly assumes you know what you're talking about.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Also, to be clear, UFC as the 8th seed did only beat the crap out of zeta's best team, they beat the crap out of alpha's best teams including your own.
It's funny how you keep illustrating that you're completely clueless regarding everything about the World League. UFC beat OFOTD by four points, and only won at all because my own stupid QB fumbled the ball in UFC territory with three minutes left. Meanwhile the Asau game was tied at the start of the fourth quarter. The Hood game wasn't at all close, but still wasn't as bad as the beating MPHD took. Machu Picchu was the weakest team we faced during that run.
jdbolick
offline
offline
And while we're on the subject of having to correct nonsense, everyone please pass around word that WiSeIVIaN's awful build guide should never be posted anywhere. I've already had to explain to a couple of different teams how completely ridiculous that thing is.
SG✬21
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
I like how you run your mouth and then when someone points out something you can't answer, you make a weird non-response to get out of acknowledging the point. Again, we were talking about team quality. You babbled something about beating Richey, VDA, and Cincinnati, so I pointed out that no one including yourself believes Miami is better than any of those teams.
You didn't get the point that I was contradicting everything you said pertaining to the rankings... As for team quality I don't expect us to have the best dots since quite a few WL teams are in some sort of network and can merge teams or draw dots from farm teams ect. We don't have that, nor do we have the luxury of being able to merge or use dots from farm teams.
Originally posted by jdbolick
The main thing I know you from is posting nonsense in the DC forum that I or some other competent DC has to then correct in case some new person mistakenly assumes you know what you're talking about.
This is pathetic dude, you have to come up with some bull shit to cover your ass because you've got nothing else to say. 1) I never post in the DC forum anymore and 2) when I did no one ever corrected me on anything so you're just making up some random stuff. Please don't deny it unless you're actually willing to direct me to a post in the DC forum where I posted something bad and you corrected it.
Originally posted by jdbolick
You honestly didn't notice everyone congratulating tautology on making the WL final right after the second round? No one gave you guys a chance even though MPHD was a flawed team. You were the 8th seed in one of the worst conferences in WL history. That means you're not a good team.
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
I like how you run your mouth and then when someone points out something you can't answer, you make a weird non-response to get out of acknowledging the point. Again, we were talking about team quality. You babbled something about beating Richey, VDA, and Cincinnati, so I pointed out that no one including yourself believes Miami is better than any of those teams.
You didn't get the point that I was contradicting everything you said pertaining to the rankings... As for team quality I don't expect us to have the best dots since quite a few WL teams are in some sort of network and can merge teams or draw dots from farm teams ect. We don't have that, nor do we have the luxury of being able to merge or use dots from farm teams.
Originally posted by jdbolick
The main thing I know you from is posting nonsense in the DC forum that I or some other competent DC has to then correct in case some new person mistakenly assumes you know what you're talking about.
This is pathetic dude, you have to come up with some bull shit to cover your ass because you've got nothing else to say. 1) I never post in the DC forum anymore and 2) when I did no one ever corrected me on anything so you're just making up some random stuff. Please don't deny it unless you're actually willing to direct me to a post in the DC forum where I posted something bad and you corrected it.
Originally posted by jdbolick
You honestly didn't notice everyone congratulating tautology on making the WL final right after the second round? No one gave you guys a chance even though MPHD was a flawed team. You were the 8th seed in one of the worst conferences in WL history. That means you're not a good team.
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by SG✬21
You didn't get the point that I was contradicting everything you said pertaining to the rankings
No, the "point" is that you didn't contradict anything at all. The discussion was about team quality, but you posted about some isolated wins, as if upsets never happen in GLB. I illustrated that by showing that not even you believe Miami was a better team than the names you mentioned.
Originally posted by
This is pathetic dude, you have to come up with some bull shit to cover your ass because you've got nothing else to say. 1) I never post in the DC forum anymore and 2) when I did no one ever corrected me on anything so you're just making up some random stuff. Please don't deny it unless you're actually willing to direct me to a post in the DC forum where I posted something bad and you corrected it.
On Oct 24, 2012 17:13:56 you posted: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly." That was a comically ignorant statement. You also posted "If you have 2 blitzing LBs with fearsome, blitz them both with a 3 man rush on the Dline and it could be a thing of beauty!" in that thread, apparently not knowing that Bort has stated that only one player with Fearsome may activate on any particular play, although Fearsome sucks anyway.
Originally posted by
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
It wasn't me, and people were saying that wherever the WL was being discussed (here, team forums, private forums, etc). I'm having a really hard time believing that you guys never noticed it.
You didn't get the point that I was contradicting everything you said pertaining to the rankings
No, the "point" is that you didn't contradict anything at all. The discussion was about team quality, but you posted about some isolated wins, as if upsets never happen in GLB. I illustrated that by showing that not even you believe Miami was a better team than the names you mentioned.Originally posted by
This is pathetic dude, you have to come up with some bull shit to cover your ass because you've got nothing else to say. 1) I never post in the DC forum anymore and 2) when I did no one ever corrected me on anything so you're just making up some random stuff. Please don't deny it unless you're actually willing to direct me to a post in the DC forum where I posted something bad and you corrected it.
On Oct 24, 2012 17:13:56 you posted: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly." That was a comically ignorant statement. You also posted "If you have 2 blitzing LBs with fearsome, blitz them both with a 3 man rush on the Dline and it could be a thing of beauty!" in that thread, apparently not knowing that Bort has stated that only one player with Fearsome may activate on any particular play, although Fearsome sucks anyway.
Originally posted by
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
It wasn't me, and people were saying that wherever the WL was being discussed (here, team forums, private forums, etc). I'm having a really hard time believing that you guys never noticed it.
Edited by jdbolick on Nov 25, 2012 21:18:40
Edited by jdbolick on Nov 25, 2012 21:18:15
SG✬21
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
No, the "point" is that you didn't contradict anything at all. The discussion was about team quality, but you posted about some isolated wins, as if upsets never happen in GLB. I illustrated that by showing that not even you believe Miami was a better team than the names you mentioned.
Originally posted by jdbolick
lolno. Miami would get killed by each of those teams. http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_ratings.pl Gurupies were 12th, Skulls were 11th, and Alpine was 26th. The only WL playoff team lower than Miami's 34th was Nashville's comical 61st. The Red Hawks were the 8th seed in a drastically inferior conference. Again, MPHD was the worst team that UFC played during its playoff run and yet they were the best team in Zeta.
Once again Richey, VDA and Cincy were all ranked higher and based on how you were judging us we didn't stand a chance because they are all ranked higher..
Originally posted by jdbolick
On Oct 24, 2012 17:13:56 you posted: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly." That was a comically ignorant statement. You also posted "If you have 2 blitzing LBs with fearsome, blitz them both with a 3 man rush on the Dline and it could be a thing of beauty!" in that thread, apparently not knowing that Bort has stated that only one player with Fearsome may activate on any particular play, although Fearsome sucks anyway.
I was not aware about fearsome not doubling up; that is definitely a mistake on my part when posting. As for the power tackler comment, I've personally had bad experiences with it on normal LBs not built for FFs. Also you said earlier you always had to correct what I said in that forum, why didn't you correct this if you thought it was so wrong?
Originally posted by jdbolick
It wasn't me, and people were saying that wherever the WL was being discussed (here, team forums, private forums, etc). I'm having a really hard time believing that you guys never noticed it.
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
I'm sorry that I'm not in every team forum so I wouldn't know what everyone else is saying. As for this forum I don't see anything that indicates "everyone" was saying taut would win. I'm having a really hard time believing that you actually think "everyone" had posted in some forum where we can see it.
No, the "point" is that you didn't contradict anything at all. The discussion was about team quality, but you posted about some isolated wins, as if upsets never happen in GLB. I illustrated that by showing that not even you believe Miami was a better team than the names you mentioned.
Originally posted by jdbolick
lolno. Miami would get killed by each of those teams. http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_ratings.pl Gurupies were 12th, Skulls were 11th, and Alpine was 26th. The only WL playoff team lower than Miami's 34th was Nashville's comical 61st. The Red Hawks were the 8th seed in a drastically inferior conference. Again, MPHD was the worst team that UFC played during its playoff run and yet they were the best team in Zeta.
Once again Richey, VDA and Cincy were all ranked higher and based on how you were judging us we didn't stand a chance because they are all ranked higher..
Originally posted by jdbolick
On Oct 24, 2012 17:13:56 you posted: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly." That was a comically ignorant statement. You also posted "If you have 2 blitzing LBs with fearsome, blitz them both with a 3 man rush on the Dline and it could be a thing of beauty!" in that thread, apparently not knowing that Bort has stated that only one player with Fearsome may activate on any particular play, although Fearsome sucks anyway.
I was not aware about fearsome not doubling up; that is definitely a mistake on my part when posting. As for the power tackler comment, I've personally had bad experiences with it on normal LBs not built for FFs. Also you said earlier you always had to correct what I said in that forum, why didn't you correct this if you thought it was so wrong?
Originally posted by jdbolick
It wasn't me, and people were saying that wherever the WL was being discussed (here, team forums, private forums, etc). I'm having a really hard time believing that you guys never noticed it.
Unless there is some super secret thread that I missed then I don't recall seeing this.. All I remember seeing is someone after the first round saying this is taut's best chance to get gold.. 1 person!!! I'm guessing that might have been you, but I can't remember nor do I wish to find it.
I'm sorry that I'm not in every team forum so I wouldn't know what everyone else is saying. As for this forum I don't see anything that indicates "everyone" was saying taut would win. I'm having a really hard time believing that you actually think "everyone" had posted in some forum where we can see it.
Edited by SG✬21 on Nov 25, 2012 21:43:14
Edited by SG✬21 on Nov 25, 2012 21:26:14
WiSeIVIaN
online
online
Originally posted by jdbolick
And while we're on the subject of having to correct nonsense, everyone please pass around word that WiSeIVIaN's awful build guide should never be posted anywhere. I've already had to explain to a couple of different teams how completely ridiculous that thing is.
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
And while we're on the subject of having to correct nonsense, everyone please pass around word that WiSeIVIaN's awful build guide should never be posted anywhere. I've already had to explain to a couple of different teams how completely ridiculous that thing is.
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
SG✬21
offline
offline
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
Wise you must have forgotten, if it isn't done in the fashion that bolick does it then it is wrong.
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
Wise you must have forgotten, if it isn't done in the fashion that bolick does it then it is wrong.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by SG✬21
Once again Richey, VDA and Cincy were all ranked higher and based on how you were judging us we didn't stand a chance because they are all ranked higher..
Being in a forum with you is like being stuck at the children's table for Thanksgiving. Please have someone explain the concept of "upsets" to you, and after they do, notice that I have repeatedly stated that OFOTD was the best team in the WL last season despite UFC beating us in the first round. Again, not even you believe that Miami was better than any of the teams you mentioned.
Originally posted by
I was not aware about fearsome not doubling up; that is definitely a mistake on my part when posting. As for the power tackler comment, I've personally had bad experiences with it on normal LBs not built for FFs. Also you said earlier you always had to correct what I said in that forum, why didn't you correct this if you thought it was so wrong?
I have grown tired of always having to correct you or some of the even worse posters. And now to do you a favor, I'm going to clue you in to the fact that playing on balanced tackling with the Power Tackler VA helps knock passes loose.
Originally posted by
As for this forum I don't see anything that indicates "everyone" was saying taut would win.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
Once again Richey, VDA and Cincy were all ranked higher and based on how you were judging us we didn't stand a chance because they are all ranked higher..
Being in a forum with you is like being stuck at the children's table for Thanksgiving.
Please have someone explain the concept of "upsets" to you, and after they do, notice that I have repeatedly stated that OFOTD was the best team in the WL last season despite UFC beating us in the first round. Again, not even you believe that Miami was better than any of the teams you mentioned.Originally posted by
I was not aware about fearsome not doubling up; that is definitely a mistake on my part when posting. As for the power tackler comment, I've personally had bad experiences with it on normal LBs not built for FFs. Also you said earlier you always had to correct what I said in that forum, why didn't you correct this if you thought it was so wrong?
I have grown tired of always having to correct you or some of the even worse posters. And now to do you a favor, I'm going to clue you in to the fact that playing on balanced tackling with the Power Tackler VA helps knock passes loose.
Originally posted by
As for this forum I don't see anything that indicates "everyone" was saying taut would win.
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
I was good before the "final play building process changes" became not-final like 4x. Yes, now lets make fun of wise for trying to help people build dots better. GENIUS!
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
NorDoor
offline
offline
In this thread it is blatantly obvious that way too many of your parents, took confidence waaaaaaayyyyyyy too high.Too bad they can't fix their builds.
Redass Ranch
offline
offline
Originally posted by NorDoor
In this thread it is blatantly obvious that way too many of your parents, took confidence waaaaaaayyyyyyy too high.Too bad they can't fix their builds.
Strength is equal, and the stacking of the two leads to "buggy" behavior.
In this thread it is blatantly obvious that way too many of your parents, took confidence waaaaaaayyyyyyy too high.Too bad they can't fix their builds.
Strength is equal, and the stacking of the two leads to "buggy" behavior.
WiSeIVIaN
online
online
Originally posted by jdbolick
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
That guide again is 100 percent outdated and people should not be using it. Still before it was outdated it was a good resource for people looking to build wl quality dots without number crunching. If you feel i either havent built wl quality dots or donno what im talking about you are mistaken.
Also unless u wanna come up with a better simple build guide and give it for free to the masses, you can stfu. Its easier to criticize than create.
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
That guide again is 100 percent outdated and people should not be using it. Still before it was outdated it was a good resource for people looking to build wl quality dots without number crunching. If you feel i either havent built wl quality dots or donno what im talking about you are mistaken.
Also unless u wanna come up with a better simple build guide and give it for free to the masses, you can stfu. Its easier to criticize than create.
Ahrens858
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
lolol
If you're not competent enough to give advice, then you shouldn't be doing it. Your build guide is like Robbnva or whodey spamming FAQ with the wrong answers. Your intent is not to give bad advice, you just can't help doing so. Unfortunately you still have a desire to be seen as knowledgeable, which is why you and they continue to give advice despite not being qualified to do so. Seriously, your build guide says a lot of things that are unquestionably wrong and you shouldn't be using it.
lolol
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
