Warrior General Games

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
That guide again is 100 percent outdated and people should not be using it. Still before it was outdated it was a good resource for people looking to build wl quality dots without number crunching. If you feel i either havent built wl quality dots or donno what im talking about you are mistaken.
No, that guide that I read was absolutely never correct. It's not a matter of being outdated, it's a matter of being bad advice. And you don't build WL quality dots. I remember having your LT on Providence and him giving up 18!!! sacks in one season.

Originally posted by
Also unless u wanna come up with a better simple build guide and give it for free to the masses, you can stfu. Its easier to criticize than create.
Are you oblivious to absolutely everything? I have written one and it's been sent around for a while now.

In light of mud slinging done during the Presidential campaign, some information is actually factual:

Originally posted by jdbolick
I remember having your LT on Providence and him giving up 18!!! sacks in one season.

this dot, Blind Talent - http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1484337&playoffs=0

gave up 18 sacks in season 21, while playing for the know defunct Providence Radicals

Originally posted by jdbolick

Being in a forum with you is like being stuck at the children's table for Thanksgiving. Please have someone explain the concept of "upsets" to you, and after they do, notice that I have repeatedly stated that OFOTD was the best team in the WL last season despite UFC beating us in the first round. Again, not even you believe that Miami was better than any of the teams you mentioned.


God I understand what an upset is, most people do.. I swear you are this thick headed person that doesn't get what I'm saying.. You were comparing Miami to teams in Alpha and said we would get killed by some of the lower seeded playoff teams but only based your argument off of rankings stating that "BSS, Dirty Island, and Alpine were all ranked higher than Miami, thus we would get killed by them" So I made a remark stating that Richey VDA and Cincy are all ranked higher than us so why weren't we killed by them? I don't expect you to understand what I just said because you seem to have problems grasping the simple facts of what I have said.

Originally posted by jdbolick

I have grown tired of always having to correct you or some of the even worse posters. And now to do you a favor, I'm going to clue you in to the fact that playing on balanced tackling with the Power Tackler VA helps knock passes loose.


You've never corrected me so I'm not sure where you are drawing this assumption.. Maybe you think you're better than most so you obviously corrected me at one time which would be incorrect. As for power tackler VA, sure it does result in more KLs but I don't like to work with more missed tackles in my defense. Like I said, I have had some bad experiences using Power Tackler on normal players thus I don't like it, but once again you probably think your right and I'm wrong.

Originally posted by SG✬21
You were comparing Miami to teams in Alpha and said we would get killed by some of the lower seeded playoff teams
You are not intellectually equipped to argue with me or anyone else who isn't adolescent, inebriated, or in some way mentally deficient. What I said was that Miami "would not have made the playoffs in Alpha." I never said any such thing about it being impossible for Miami to ever beat one of the Alpha playoffs teams, as turnover-filled sims do happen. You're either being dense or dishonest.

Originally posted by
You've never corrected me so I'm not sure where you are drawing this assumption..
Not in that particular thread, but I have in plenty of others. It's not a personal thing, as I have to correct people all the time, but your incorrect statements in the DC forum are the main reason I am aware of your existence.

Originally posted by
As for power tackler VA, sure it does result in more KLs but I don't like to work with more missed tackles in my defense.
lol, don't lie. You had no idea that Power Tackler helped with KLs. If you had the slightest clue then you never would have said: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly."

This is really amusing. You Chicago guys are comical not only because you're slow, but because you're too slow to realize you shouldn't keep posting.

Originally posted by SG✬21
As for power tackler VA, sure it does result in more KLs but I don't like to work with more missed tackles in my defense. Like I said, I have had some bad experiences using Power Tackler on normal players thus I don't like it, but once again you probably think your right and I'm wrong.


This contributed to OFOTD loss in the WL final s30 fwiw.

Going for KL is fine but what about this average powerback going off
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2162521&pbp_id=9777078
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2162521&pbp_id=9778522

That back broke 6 tackles on 9 rushes against Asau too. And for the record, LBs only accounted for three of the missed tackles in our game.

Originally posted by jdbolick
That back broke 6 tackles on 9 rushes against Asau too. And for the record, LBs only accounted for three of the missed tackles in our game.

And what about all of these missed tackles
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2200353

There is nothing wrong with using PT in the secondary, just need to remember there are negatives to using it as well as the positives. Each DC should decide how it works best for them

Originally posted by jdbolick

lol, don't lie. You had no idea that Power Tackler helped with KLs. If you had the slightest clue then you never would have said: "Power tackler is a huge waste because LBs usually only have 70-80 tackling and if you take them off of wrap up tackle, it could get VERY ugly."

This is really amusing. You Chicago guys are comical not only because you're slow, but because you're too slow to realize you shouldn't keep posting.


Or maybe I was just talking about tackling since that was my main problem with PT..

Originally posted by jdbolick

You are not intellectually equipped to argue with me or anyone else who isn't adolescent, inebriated, or in some way mentally deficient. What I said was that Miami "would not have made the playoffs in Alpha." I never said any such thing about it being impossible for Miami to ever beat one of the Alpha playoffs teams, as turnover-filled sims do happen. You're either being dense or dishonest.

Originally posted by jdbolick
lolno. Miami would get killed by each of those teams. http://goallineblitz.com/game/team_ratings.pl Gurupies were 12th, Skulls were 11th, and Alpine was 26th. The only WL playoff team lower than Miami's 34th was Nashville's comical 61st. The Red Hawks were the 8th seed in a drastically inferior conference. Again, MPHD was the worst team that UFC played during its playoff run and yet they were the best team in Zeta.

So then this whole post by you was just some random babbling on your part? Seriously all I pointed out was Miami beat 3 teams ranked higher than them and you were comparing teams based on rankings.. I just had to prove to you that those rankings don't mean much. I wasn't talking about team quality or who would actually win the game if we played them.


Originally posted by jdbolick
Not in that particular thread, but I have in plenty of others. It's not a personal thing, as I have to correct people all the time, but your incorrect statements in the DC forum are the main reason I am aware of your existence..

I've only ever ran into you here or in the DC forum. Not once have I seen you or for that matter anyone completely correct what I said. FYI it doesn't count as correcting someone if you never post something in reply to what they've said. Plus in the DC forum I only ever asked questions anyway, thats when I was a newb to DCing.


Originally posted by snakes22
And what about all of these missed tackles
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=2200353

There is nothing wrong with using PT in the secondary, just need to remember there are negatives to using it as well as the positives. Each DC should decide how it works best for them

Well I guess when I'm talking to bolick about this I'm always wrong.

Well bolick this has been a fun argument but it's boring me now so I'm just going to give up posting (in reply to you that is) because there is no need for me to state my point of views or opinions on something with you in the same thread.

Once again congratz on your gold gif.

i hope i play chicago in week 1

Originally posted by hays23
i hope i play chicago in week 1

Looks like you'll have to jump in the ring and duke it out with the Widow Makers because they want the same thing.

Originally posted by hays23
i hope i play chicago in week 1

I find it funny that both SG and JD are measuring their DC ego's, when the real living legend here is hays with the long lost art of excel scouting.

Originally posted by jdbolick
And you don't build WL quality dots. I remember having your LT on Providence and him giving up 18!!! sacks in one season.


Now you are just getting ridiculous. So 1 OT build has 1 bad season.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=2249832&playoffs=0 did well in WL s29 and will do well this season. I'd post other examples of my players who got actively recruited by WL teams and had success, but I'd rather tell you to go fuck yourself.

Originally posted by bhall43
fwiw, UFC was obviously a LOT better than an 8 seed but due to some early screw ups we almost missed the show. Also I am historically a slow starting OC.

I'm so slow at starting out that Alpine missed the playoffs?